It
is interesting to me that the first person has such a new presence in academic
writing. After being taught so vehemently all these years not to use “I,” all
of a sudden it in encouraged. I wonder whether elementary school teachers
will eventually begin to teach students its proper usage, as Graff and
Birkenstein attempt to do.
In
chapter five, “And Yet,” Graff and Birkenstein endorse the first person, while
making an important distinction in when using it is appropriate. When
introducing an argument, to distinguish one’s own argument from that of others,
for instance, it acceptable to write, “I will be arguing.” The time to avoid
using “I,” however, is when asserting another’s point. Graff and Birkenstein
use the example, “’she is correct’ instead of ‘I think that she is correct’”
(73). I would agree that this is a valid point. Using “I” too often runs the
risk of sounding monotonous, to use Graff and Birkenstein’s word.
Where
my opinion differs from that of Graff and Birkenstein, though, is on the point of
why using “I” has been looked down upon for so long. They use two words to
describe the way first-person writing sounds, according to teachers:
“subjective” and “self-indulgent” (72). Subjective? Sure, for what word is more
subjective than “I”? Self-indulgent is where my views diverge. To me, rather
than looking to make a point or a whole paper self-important the use of first
person shows a lack of confidence. Instead of asserting one’s own opinions as
truths (which in itself is a bit self-indulgent, isn’t it?), as in the example
above of “she is correct,” the phrase “I think that she is correct” shows
reluctance, almost shyness, in the writer’ own point. In feeling the need to
preface a point with “I think” or something of the like is indicative of “in my
humble opinion,” which asserts a significant lack of confidence.
I
am partial to first person, and hope it is here to stay in academic writing. It
is an effective way to begin an argument, or counter a differing point. And
yet, as the saying goes, all good things in moderation. Its over usage has the
potential to hinder student writing by sounding insecure. The use of “I” should
be limited in academic writing to build confidence in student writing and the
points they are trying to make.
"In feeling the need to preface a point with “I think” or something of the like is indicative of “in my humble opinion,” which asserts a significant lack of confidence. "
ReplyDeleteWell said. The "I" in academic writing often appears as something "understood." Professionals can avoid it and still sound empowered. For my student writers, however, all too often the attempt to avoid "I" leads to dreary writing full of convoluted syntax and weak verbs. Thus, used judiciously, "I" brings the writer back into the conversation.