I am a notorious skeptic.
Upon picking up Graff and Birkenstein’s They Say I Say, I was not sure I believed that this book should be
“required reading for faculty and students” or “would make for a better
classroom—and a more articulate world” as one critic remarked. I wondered: how could a two hundred-page book
teach me how to be a better writer or a more effective writing assistant? Maybe this was my naïve know—it—all young man
attitude speaking, but nevertheless, I was skeptical. However, after reading the sections on
agreeing and disagreeing in academia, I now have a greater appreciation for They Say I Say. In fact, Graff and Birkenstein’s points on creating
originality and potential ways to foster originality were quite intriguing.
As a student, one thing I am always mindful of is ensuring
that I create an original argument one way or another. From my relatively small amount of academic
experience it seems to me that this may be a universal problem for
students. In fact, Graff and Birkenstein
acknowledge this when they voice a common student concern “it often may seem
that you need to be an expert in a field to have an argument at all” (55). This is the sort of stigma that should be a priority
for us to exterminate. How would we ever
go about doing this, students always push back and claim they can never make a
better argument than a professional academic?
I have been searching for an answer to this question and could not seem
to find a lead. Although I am still
looking, Graff and Birkenstein have helped me in my search. In fact, Graff and Birkenstein’s use of
templates have definitely pointed me in the right direction. They offer the explanation that, either for
agreeing or disagreeing with a claim, students can draw emphasis to a point the
original author had not. To illustrate
this, the authors provided us with some very explicit templates. Ones that resonated with me that I think
should be introduced to students are: “X’s theory of ______ is extremely useful
because it sheds light on the difficult problem of _________”, or “X is surely
right about________ because, as she may not be aware, recent studies
have shown that________” (62). Although this
clearly does not explicitly help us find a way to beat the “originality stigma”,
I think the answer may be in the templates.
To sum it all up Graff and Birkenstein offered the comforting words to aspiring
academics and myself “as long as you can support a view taken by someone else
without merely restating what he or she has said, there is no reason to worry
about being ‘unoriginal’” (63). If
students were exposed to templates like this it may help them think of making
arguments in a new way. Maybe it is as
simple as showing students these templates, but the septic inside of me wonders—maybe
not?
Writing this blog post has proven to be a very stressful but
very valuable experience for me. It has
put me in the shoes of the writer instead of just the potential writing
consultant. In essence, after writing
this post I now have a better feel of what it is like to be the student
requesting help. It surely is
intimidating knowing that fifteen other bright students will be critiquing and
responding to my work. All my worried
thoughts and questions about my writing have bubbled to the surface. I am worried that the preceding paragraph is
too long or does not make a coherent point, I have misspelled things, or used incorrect
grammar. I think this exercise has
proved even more to me the importance of being approachable to the student
because submitting one's academic work to another is scary! Moreover, I realize even more that it is
important that the student doesn’t feel judged.
We are supposed to be supportive not unapproachable. I think a perfect example of how you may have
judged my work was my intentional typo of “skeptic” in the previous
paragraph. I typed the word “septic”
instead of “skeptic”. In this situation
you may have judged me. Maybe you laughed
and thought how careless I must have been, but either way you passed some sort
of judgment. I think it is important to
limit this as much as possible when it comes to the students. To truly make an impact on the students they
need to see us as their peers not a superior.
Consultants need to be approachable!
Mitchell Kneeshaw
Works Cited
Graff,
Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W.W. Norton
&, 2010. Print.
Nicely said. I don't understand the student attitude that student claims must be strikingly original. Build on others' work and show one's learning. That's enough most of the time. After all, you folks are STUDENTS, eh? When I see students learning from Kerouac (subject to a great deal of popular critical work and some scholarship) that's enough for me. When students clearly "write to get it done" I can see that too. I don't need original claims: I need to see students encountering a subject that is new to them.
ReplyDelete